The Music We Hate: Daniel Johnston

John Semley June 22, 2010 Daniel Johnston sings about soda pop because he doesn’t think capitalism or empire or Coca-Colanization is a problem.”

This is an online supplement to Maisonneuve’s print-only “The Music We Hate” feature (Issue 36, Summer 2010). To read Carl Wilson on Radiohead, Sean Michaels on Sufjan Stevens and more, buy the print edition in stores or contact us to order it.

If you slapped Cheap Monday lab coats on all the tastemakers in the blogosphere and locked them in a laboratory, there’s still no chance they’d ever Frankenstein together Daniel Johnston. Pudgy and mentally ill, Johnston is equal parts Syd Barrett, Brian Wilson, Wesley Willis and Bazooka Joe bubblegum comic. He sings about Satan and Barbie and soda pop and King Kong. In so doing he has emerged as the unwitting poster boy of the so-called “New Sincerity” aesthetics in popular music—taken up by Will Oldham, Beat Happening, Joanna Newsom and others who shun ironic posturing for a more unselfconscious relationship to emotion, life experience and blah blah blah.

There is a certain naiveté in Johnston’s music that is easy to romanticize. This was especially true in the 1990s, when alternative rock music was typified by slackerish cynicism toward corporations, record labels, love songs and all the other trappings of staid bourgeois profiteering. Hardened punkers like Henry Rollins would have to concoct some whole new brand of irony to get away with singing campfire ditties about Mountain Dew or Casper the Friendly Ghost, but as warbled by the bipolar “genius” Johnston, such songs were just dandy.

Enter Kurt Cobain sporting a t-shirt emblazoned with the cover of Johnston’s Hi, How Are You?, filmmaker Larry Clark plopping Johnston songs onto the soundtrack of his teenage AIDS-panic provocation Kids and, in 2006, the release of Jeff Feuerzeig’s Sundance smash-hit documentary The Devil and Daniel Johnston.

Feuerzeig’s film is full of memorable scenes—Sonic Youth scouring Manhattan for a misplaced Johnston, Butthole Surfers frontman Gibby Haynes being interviewed while a dental hygienist slaves away on his formidably gnarly grill—but despite its merits, it remains most accountable for spurring a renewed interest in Johnston’s music and persona. This is not altogether a bad thing. Given the measured approach the film takes to Johnston’s alleged giftedness as a songwriter, it ends up posing many important questions about capital-a Authenticity in rock music. In the wake of the film, however, many new Johnston fans seem oblivious to such questions, opting for the easy answer that, yes, Johnston’s a real-McCoy musical virtuoso, and not just a curiosity.

Outsider musicians—those hardnosed radicals that recoil from the machinations of the commercial music industry—thrive on the idea of Authenticity. Captain Beefheart, the Shaggs, Skip Spence, the Residents: all operate on or well outside the fringes of popular taste. All are singularly unique. But interpreting idiosyncrasy as anything like
actual brilliance requires any number of spurious equations. Unlistenable? Uncompromising! Musically impenetrable? Sonically dense! Schizoid madman? Implacable Authentic!

Beyond these bogus equivalencies, appreciating Johnston also requires a good deal of sinister coddling. Those who dig him dig him because he’s so sincere; because—whether as a result of his natural disposition, bad trips on LSD, mental infirmity or some combination thereof—he lacks the ability to be snarky and ironic. Thumping on what sounds like a conked-out Hammond organ, on “Speeding Motorcycle” Johnston sings, “We don’t need reason and we don’t need logic/’Cos we got feeling and we’re dang proud of it.” A pretty sentiment, sure, but one hindered by our reflexivity and self-consciousness. So instead we divest ourselves in Johnston’s jejune defenselessness, allowing him to be innocent for us.

The past two decades of alternative rock have slouched halfheartedly against the corporate interests of major record labels, MTV, Rolling Stone and the rest; Johnston sings about soda pop because he doesn’t think capitalism or empire or Coca-Colanization is a problem. Like the chronic raving against the asylum, Daniel Johnston may be artless, unpolished and way out of his gourd, but goshdarnit, he’s real. (Check that audacious burp on “Catie”!)

This strategy for recuperating Johnston may typify our approach to many outsider artists. But the difference is that—unlike Captain Beefheart or Brian Wilson—Johnston’s kookiness isn’t backed up by the music itself. Strip away his compromised compos mentis and you’re left with crap like “Queenie the Doggie” from 2009’s Is and Always Was, a jingly-jangly ditty full of such empty lyrics as “Queenie the doggie, the special one/She always had the most fun most all of the time/Queenie the dog!”

To listen to Johnston is to hear the fractured echo of unrealized sincerity. We cannot be him, we cannot access his “authentic” experience, and so must romanticize him, cover his songs and sport his scribbled drawings like brand names. It’s a telling, too-obvious irony that you can now buy the Hi, How Are You? shirt made famous by Cobain for $40 at Urban Outfitters.

John Semley is a Maisonneuve contributing editor.

Related on maisonneuve.org:

—The Music We Hate: Destroyer
—The Music We Hate: Belle and Sebastian
—The Music We Hate: Timber Timbre

Subscribe to MaisonneuveFollow Maisy on TwitterLike Maisy on Facebook

5 Comments

The writer makes some valid points although I would argue with taking one line from one song on “Is And Always Was” and establishing a verdict on the songwriting.

Regarding Johnston's “alleged giftedness as a songwriter” — listen to M. Ward's cover of “To Go Home”, Beck performing “True Love Will Find You In The End”, or Eddie Vedder singing “Walking The Cow.” If you can't get past Daniel Johnston's own performances, you need to at least listen to the songs.

Every songwriter from McCartney to Simon to Dylan have a song or two that if you wanted to nit pick — you could criticize. It's the high points that matter…and Daniel has plenty.

Posted by Tom on June 24, 2010

I judge Paul McCartney's entire catalogue on the basis of “Temporary Secretary” and have come to regard it as unimpeachable.

Posted by John on June 25, 2010

John Semley is a RUBE!!!

Posted by John Reeves on July 8, 2010

Valid points, especially about Johnson's romantic public image. But to say Johnson's songwriting is naive kind of misses the point. Think about his mental illness ballads — “Peek A Boo” and “Story Of An Artist” — it's the pain that is interesting. You can try to invalidate him all you want but he is relatively articulate and unflinching about his personal agony, and he is funny, which is more than we can say for most.

Also he is in fact snarky and ironic. Think of the lines “Hope for the hopeless I'm learning to cope/With emotionless mediocrity woo-oah/Day to day Living.” Sounds snarky to me.

If you question his giftedness as a songwriter, I have to say you are not the yardstick of good art. We have to frequently remind ourselves of this. I think, for example, that The Beatles should be a pathetic footnote to music history. Paul McCartney writes uninteresting jingles, John Lennon wrote sentimental drivel, the best thing George Harrison ever did was the Traveling Wilburys, and Ringo, of course, doesn't even rate. I feel free to say that because none of them depend on us folks to buy their records, not anymore or for a long time.

Daniel Johnson, on the other hand, after a life as a burden to his family is finally making a living. Let him get some money in the bank and redeem himself and be remembered with admiration. He deserves it so much more than all the privileged art school kids out there making music. Let the bloggers and tastemakers prop up Daniel Johnson, let the pretentious hipsters buy his records. Who cares if most miss the point? There are people in psychosis who can listen to Daniel Johnson and feel connected and maybe put off killing themselves for a day or two. That is, I think, more worthy than anything we have to say in discussion about it.

Posted by Aaron Golbeck on July 13, 2010

Saying that he is psychotic thus is unable to use or understand irony is a step away from being a rock critic and one step towards claiming psychiatric skills. Listening thoroughly through the guy's stuff, it's a question that one can but asks himself.. What can be attributed to his pathology and what can be attributed to his personality ( as in his own personal work and efforts ) Having done so many times ( listening to his stuff even the most “unlistenable” ) my own personal conclusion is that coming from such a prolific author it would be underestimating his own part of creativity and talent. I would hazard to guess his most bizarre stuff certainly correspond to the period when he started experimenting psychiatric problems but what do I know? Another point is that your article seems to reduce his work to a pose ( a sort of sincere attitude that leads to a pose ) That is no doubt oblivious to the fact people are first attracted to his simple yet very catchy efficient tunes. And because his naive world blends so well with it and thus makes it a unique experience. Many people here in France dont understand what the guy he is saying and don't know his background but that doesn't prevent them from enjoying his music. ( well usually his more accessible stuff ) Yes there's captain beefheart ( which doesnt share that much musically with Daniel ) and there's the Shaggs ( their universe is certainly much closer ) but as much as their work is unique, his is unique too. Sorry to sound like an old fart but nowadays it's getting harder and harder to find this quality. Jee listen to his most experimental lo-fi stuff. When someone approaches that nowadays he creates a new musical scene in Germany. I will finish by saying that I love his songwriting. I find his lyrics beautiful and very funny. Yes, intelligent actually. There are many reasons why I love his work, but none are that this guy is considered naive.

Posted by DarQMugwump on March 9, 2011

Tenth Anniversary: Spring

ISSUE 43 Tenth Anniversary: Spring 2012

online content:

also in this issue:

  • Face the Music

    by Tim Falconer How can someone who passionately loves music also be a terrible singer? Tim Falconer takes up voice lessons—and discovers the surprising science of tone deafness.
  • The Big Job

    by Deni Y. Béchard As a teenager, Deni Y. Béchard went to Vancouver to live with his father, an ex-con with a penchant for telling tall tales. He met a man desperate to forget the past.
  • The Homesickness of Astronauts

    by Johanna Skibsrud "She felt a great sadness. She would remember next to nothing of this, even soon."
  • [see full issue contents]